{"id":"W322941942","doi":"10.29173/slw6965","title":"Information Literacy and Education Policy: A Canadian Case Study","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School Libraries Worldwide","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Christian ministry; Literacy; Curriculum; Education policy; Jurisdiction; Political science; Rhetorical question; Literacy education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Public relations; Higher education","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006353597,0.00008881671,0.00007557718,0.0005083388,0.001055366,0.001566174,0.0001558538,0.00005212149,0.0001848788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003957402,0.00008852515,0.00001780563,0.001000788,0.0001540832,0.01328748,0.00002879877,0.0001167759,0.00006694574],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009949568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006148694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3913448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3716837,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989859,0.00008035573,0.0002424082,0.000118233,0.0002233253,0.0003497591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989449,0.0000882844,0.0000753265,0.0001466457,0.00005179324,0.0006930986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001866773,0.0000762196,0.5104899,0.000008697866,0.000008706577,0.0001247006,0.1193479,8.180316e-7,0.000002402143,0.2157062,0.008971835,0.1452439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002179425,0.00008427749,0.155539,0.00001714203,0.000008758694,0.00008496966,0.2095275,0.000006748877,0.00002785346,0.01502694,0.6192163,0.0002426046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665608,0.00008248238,0.0000374277,0.01207783,0.0003559405,0.000484648,0.0000065524,0.00008223748,0.1203121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913589,0.000008684575,0.0006575025,0.003395177,0.0005013447,0.00001145363,0.00001830307,0.000004347158,0.004044229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6102444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01179719135057513,"score_gpt":0.3077350999136064,"score_spread":0.2959379085630313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}