{"id":"W3254258","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2265.1988.tb03850.x","title":"A Reason for Reasoning? Theorizing the Function of Public Argument through an Analysis of Dissident Protest","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Endocrinology","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Performative utterance; Politics; Agency (philosophy); Action (physics); Conviction; Rationality; Function (biology); Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005533549,0.00009459572,0.00042649,0.00006106636,0.0002528526,0.00002220197,0.0003022371,0.00003705707,0.000223699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005227649,0.00005940081,0.0002783875,0.00008886805,0.0006707362,0.0001630945,0.0001071926,0.0001293397,0.000004286461],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001924687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002760758,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001278319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008512522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985132,0.0002806397,0.0007070018,0.00019319,0.0001091204,0.0001968458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977067,0.001000654,0.0004384559,0.0005600678,0.0002657894,0.00002836128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006745542,0.0003406228,0.009120728,0.000007015481,0.0008308007,7.875763e-8,0.00385559,0.00001524484,0.000004274802,0.9494686,0.000303663,0.03598597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008492146,0.001109044,0.04624965,0.00001970335,0.001460955,9.9779e-7,0.01587328,0.001325874,0.00006088646,0.0110987,0.9217874,0.0001643187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9199538,0.004495189,0.01057659,0.01776045,0.0009951773,0.001299461,0.0000746761,0.0001366496,0.04470805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973641,0.0006606288,0.0004737874,0.0002287115,0.0003288019,0.0001577659,0.00002083828,0.000007356403,0.0007580074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2471355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1865058852546368,"score_gpt":0.3941910335724614,"score_spread":0.2076851483178246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}