{"id":"W328164696","doi":"10.2166/wqrj.2002.009","title":"Follow-up Studies Addressing Questions Identified During Cycle 1 of the Adult Fish Survey of the Pulp and Paper EEM Program","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Perch; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Effluent; Pulp mill; Forage fish; Weir; Paper mill; Fishery; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Environmental engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004293999,0.00008280968,0.000177871,0.00003386044,0.001340508,0.00005826894,0.0003988786,0.00004045644,0.0003609162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012473,0.00004013066,0.00007926483,0.0002289512,0.001386901,0.0002386054,0.001268678,0.0004135483,0.000009955578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006844177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004914938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006729636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01318296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966834,0.001777634,0.0003662383,0.0001658095,0.0006394184,0.0003675136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992329,0.0002022601,0.0001174998,0.0002545192,0.000146828,0.00004602108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003823848,0.0001773961,0.9776472,0.00009237607,0.0001780186,0.000002491726,0.00488947,0.0000310488,0.004263362,0.00002944764,0.0115372,0.001113791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003632198,0.00003541193,0.9947549,0.00007357443,0.00001504451,0.000005675821,0.001077613,0.00001933966,0.002542312,0.0008973594,0.0001621807,0.00005334843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932073,0.00008670687,8.531568e-7,0.005336056,0.0001625501,0.0002878364,0.000007479398,0.000006757152,0.0009044733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966469,0.0003947635,0.00002502006,0.0000890947,0.00001822782,0.00002158264,3.949054e-7,0.000005396216,0.002798557],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01710776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2007784610901387,"score_gpt":0.4052075848266369,"score_spread":0.2044291237364982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}