{"id":"W332183143","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2014.018","title":"Evaluations of conventional, ozone and UV/H2O2 for removal of emerging contaminants and THM-FPs","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Water Treatment and Disinfection","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Ozone; Hydrogen peroxide; Environmental chemistry; Chemistry; Water treatment; Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products; Contamination; Wastewater; Sewage treatment; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005420744,0.00006080563,0.0001439175,0.00007550928,0.0002676116,0.00004303558,0.00006372508,0.00003407477,0.0002998825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002083524,0.00004061195,0.0000526382,0.00005979331,0.0003179461,0.0002519556,0.00009123563,0.00009847705,0.000008292007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004266396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001010389,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002359835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004903748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998378,0.0004626574,0.0003044994,0.0001359678,0.0005019171,0.0002169794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994608,0.000163768,0.00007908962,0.00009004092,0.0001145535,0.00009173464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006124558,0.000652594,0.4803979,0.0002677984,0.0001767359,0.000005433604,0.005588978,0.00008255679,0.457863,0.002792866,0.001647422,0.04991218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00560429,0.001356994,0.7885556,0.0001362422,0.00008290001,0.0002789355,0.001405507,0.001951192,0.1287546,0.06578235,0.005854499,0.0002369098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964005,0.00006145432,0.001953752,0.0006547722,0.00004922186,0.0001854667,0.000006620569,0.000002726636,0.0006854313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983644,0.00005062128,0.0008593056,0.000008708217,0.00004650091,0.000007129188,0.000008018629,0.000004801383,0.0006504544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3291084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3283503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1335994259403548,"score_gpt":0.4378679912409705,"score_spread":0.3042685653006157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}