{"id":"W342331558","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_00771","title":"Geography, Ties, and Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Citations in Mathematics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Subject matter; Similarity (geometry); Interpersonal ties; Geographical distance; Economic geography; Quality (philosophy); Geography; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Demography; Epistemology; Economic growth; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004338798,0.0002672136,0.0006681611,0.01030348,0.001125357,0.002868869,0.0006836692,0.001003924,0.00457123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08396628,0.0002368476,0.0004648447,0.03284613,0.001284174,0.002936149,0.002776864,0.001044415,0.0009138627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007464172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000734889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009147156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007642795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954695,0.002064409,0.0005488438,0.0005385224,0.001128193,0.0002505963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8473479,0.09320746,0.04200272,0.00382237,0.009414625,0.004204934],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001456026,0.0001095093,0.9681952,0.0003236977,0.0005565486,0.0002097291,0.002182997,0.001096714,0.0001133856,0.003806849,0.001394691,0.02186505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004846416,0.000100358,0.9763561,0.0002995281,0.0005137633,0.0002532117,0.00347603,0.001905761,0.0002542122,0.0110804,0.005675361,0.00003679334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851217,0.005953053,0.0009190214,0.00154593,0.00003948259,0.00001256737,0.001093563,0.00001485706,0.005299787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963064,0.00235482,0.0002243456,0.00005263495,0.0001053895,0.000009881697,0.0005154301,0.000006182062,0.0004249844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02294606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5123037864089308,"score_gpt":0.53942883396618,"score_spread":0.0271250475572492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}