{"id":"W344409084","doi":"10.1016/j.jspi.2010.02.022","title":"Improved attribute acceptance sampling plans based on maxima nomination sampling","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Acceptance sampling; Nomination; Sampling (signal processing); Sample (material); Simple random sample; Statistics; Maxima; Sample size determination; Plan (archaeology); Computer science; Mathematics; Sampling design; Ideal (ethics); Acceptance testing; Algorithm; Geography; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898383,0.0002010827,0.0004392698,0.0002672628,0.0002653277,0.0003946842,0.0004388342,0.0001130701,0.0001056423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03328692,0.0001501159,0.0000462705,0.0002699035,0.0001988031,0.0005047368,0.00005970811,0.001047328,0.0000107236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000386297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001341471,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003467263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997201,0.00007264766,0.001022067,0.0003574431,0.001006582,0.0003402869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848343,0.01326233,0.0006614574,0.0002206469,0.0006977159,0.0003235971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00133208,0.0003064052,0.1216927,0.0001051426,0.00004618935,0.0002180088,0.0007585392,0.03149676,0.03318831,0.05389513,0.0006096686,0.7563511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001943727,0.00135768,0.4135273,0.0004916295,0.00005921659,0.0000851384,0.0006907269,0.3986965,0.001276037,0.1782772,0.00287321,0.0007216535],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06717115,0.00002952006,0.9313216,0.0002081702,0.0006975157,0.00006177792,0.0001724523,0.00001605144,0.0003218167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7677959,0.000003182412,0.2318713,0.00009656826,0.0001992492,0.000001756139,0.000004630514,0.00001008524,0.00001734329],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7556294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1566201837331866,"score_gpt":0.4574418177439295,"score_spread":0.3008216340107429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}