{"id":"W346474912","doi":"","title":"Taking the Costs of Consent Seriously: An Alternative Understanding of Legal Efficiency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Allocative efficiency; Process (computing); Economics; Premise; Outcome (game theory); Transaction cost; Empirical legal studies; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Legal profession; Computer science; Legislature","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0220688,0.001531221,0.001688084,0.0043102,0.002907163,0.01528873,0.004983002,0.009353447,0.00935845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03746254,0.0008500399,0.00284524,0.002890843,0.03318205,0.0272512,0.006593991,0.008601459,0.0009186026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00998405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007743492,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001666666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.972232,0.0131274,0.001189484,0.00283951,0.008165535,0.002446154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564494,0.03064582,0.002858883,0.005779109,0.003632197,0.0006346543],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003193348,0.000005911335,0.00006752583,0.00001247771,0.00000306455,0.00001429945,0.0001203062,0.0008912352,0.00002357669,0.9978998,0.0001070718,0.000851575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001207534,0.00001257747,0.0001242625,0.00004674956,0.000008612811,0.00003778457,0.0001259632,0.004137824,0.0001145733,0.9913831,0.003988077,0.000008381463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.03543141,0.002813853,0.6198958,0.04544558,0.0002307886,0.0004189513,0.0002386846,0.0001362964,0.2953887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912371,0.001863671,0.05994305,0.003060341,0.0006583947,0.0008153935,0.00009593495,0.0001618476,0.02103043],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0220688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1167123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07319940104855975,"score_gpt":0.2638709908323736,"score_spread":0.1906715897838138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}