{"id":"W346900110","doi":"10.58680/rte201011647","title":"Of Literary Import: A Case of Cross-National Similarities in the Secondary English Curriculum in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in the Teaching of English","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; National curriculum; Secondary education; Cross-cultural; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Linguistics; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01835235,0.00006541574,0.0001205307,0.0003048796,0.0002549645,0.0001049324,0.0006340522,0.00006158858,0.00002810611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01722148,0.00003963417,0.00002349717,0.0006117963,0.0007281831,0.0001834274,0.00005346303,0.001443955,3.048449e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005122768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001586323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9131733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8551946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958777,0.002617626,0.0003448564,0.0001122919,0.0007803584,0.0002671228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940735,0.004913243,0.00009513887,0.0002031248,0.0006759402,0.00003905302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008887747,0.000177431,0.08921406,0.00006275859,0.000003635515,0.00002167259,0.8678609,0.00002209181,0.000004391069,0.03983855,0.001948404,0.0008371937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005054945,0.00004917817,0.06916465,0.00008650007,0.000002533767,0.000008264431,0.8356249,0.0004500276,0.0000234466,0.008553491,0.08542942,0.0001020397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807503,0.00009240862,3.568445e-8,0.001461503,0.0001439814,0.0002749146,0.00008710776,0.000003113381,0.01718662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993555,0.00003838233,0.00002192015,0.0002504324,0.000252407,0.00001916971,0.00002292547,0.000003952845,0.00003530451],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08348101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910569,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07422120059151041,"score_gpt":0.4895338890959621,"score_spread":0.4153126885044517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}