{"id":"W34903095","doi":"10.1177/10778012211060861","title":"Taxonomic studies on Australian Hookeriaceae (Musci) 4. Summary and bryogeographic notes","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of The Hattori Botanical Laboratory","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Geography; Biology; Zoology; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004710165,0.0001764873,0.0003559977,0.00001310838,0.0003561269,0.00005401786,0.0003131397,0.0001022635,0.00003573501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002335917,0.00005230873,0.0001999254,0.0003924699,0.0002477299,0.0001214503,0.0001317669,0.000358782,0.000005441481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005017649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001950145,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001547755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002268263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987445,0.0001533674,0.0004266098,0.0001767098,0.0002570114,0.0002417429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998809,0.000395232,0.0003660144,0.00008257494,0.0002057071,0.0001415054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001539792,0.00112051,0.5907865,0.00008683234,0.001867453,0.00039006,0.0003695374,0.00007221081,0.1330394,0.002192306,0.216498,0.05203735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037079,0.0009178591,0.498693,0.0002031532,0.00008586145,0.00006369976,0.0009624875,0.00000209391,0.0005079421,0.0004290974,0.4975104,0.0002536061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814143,0.003448761,1.380988e-7,0.009995823,0.004903786,0.00009191287,0.00002221974,0.00001230832,0.0001107386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915274,0.004419091,0.00004639179,0.0006565006,0.003149142,0.000002251975,2.793522e-7,0.00000190721,0.0001969856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2810124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2739076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02872146044294575,"score_gpt":0.2448427923037888,"score_spread":0.216121331860843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}