{"id":"W355325858","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.068","title":"Reducing the environmental footprint of interior wood doors in non-residential buildings – part 2: ecodesign","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"FPInnovations","keywords":"Ecodesign; Remanufacturing; Life-cycle assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Ecological footprint; Carbon footprint; Container (type theory); Doors; Sustainability; Engineering; Product (mathematics); Production (economics); Manufacturing engineering; Greenhouse gas","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001978862,0.0001308092,0.0002121204,0.00006993466,0.00005435782,0.00002202902,0.000259314,0.00005379462,0.0002039681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001904336,0.0000928083,0.0001022887,0.0001189356,0.0003182272,0.0004399963,0.0001615527,0.0002877391,0.00001411047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007210887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002050181,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001950626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000308333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983074,0.0001532991,0.0006179892,0.0002021436,0.0005037301,0.000215419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991432,0.00002030105,0.0004612695,0.0002537665,0.000008833961,0.0001125715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00106377,0.0006945064,0.3108872,0.00003858055,0.00006261734,0.00004068447,0.01491114,0.07401361,0.5252557,0.000006022473,0.005085083,0.06794102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001377547,0.001044564,0.5302956,0.0001005694,0.00007708523,0.0004040845,0.01303401,0.0002502543,0.4448262,0.0009792111,0.007285431,0.0003254116],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978884,0.00004407812,0.0001402441,0.0008998518,0.0005275343,0.0002272107,6.946563e-7,0.000003328546,0.0002686601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988229,0.00004177813,0.0005192249,0.00002264544,0.0002503278,0.000003112934,5.213091e-7,0.00001290531,0.0003266188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2194083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3784612,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01429257170503366,"score_gpt":0.242284968469868,"score_spread":0.2279923967648344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}