{"id":"W355325858","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.068","title":"Reducing the environmental footprint of interior wood doors in non-residential buildings – part 2: ecodesign","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cleaner Production","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"FPInnovations","keywords":"Ecodesign; Remanufacturing; Life-cycle assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Ecological footprint; Carbon footprint; Container (type theory); Doors; Sustainability; Engineering; Product (mathematics); Production (economics); Manufacturing engineering; Greenhouse gas","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003844995,0.0004731543,0.0003212696,0.0005810091,0.0005768971,0.001117194,0.0008186876,0.0003591209,0.01308831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006993145,0.0002073713,0.0005255445,0.0007790393,0.0003783045,0.0007255881,0.0006452565,0.000276542,0.001121193],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004228036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002324717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01018658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.0001575541,0.00002086833,0.00005945877,0.0002304634,0.0001102531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996589,0.00008673068,0.00004325916,0.00006403706,0.0001135259,0.00003344084],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008064168,0.001697722,0.06453593,0.00213898,0.0002006722,0.000357205,0.001480554,0.05049957,0.3059221,0.009431786,0.00335737,0.5595716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009715809,0.003374136,0.4788065,0.0005341318,0.0005999143,0.001445747,0.007674998,0.04790231,0.3788609,0.00978521,0.07079089,0.0001281904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452877,0.001169967,0.02493059,0.000127615,0.00004786237,0.0001078367,0.0002026134,0.0001324649,0.02799341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714009,0.0006175602,0.01693754,0.00003905852,0.0000126708,0.00004020855,0.0001758553,0.00005814943,0.01071811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01308831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0437848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01429257170503366,"score_gpt":0.242284968469868,"score_spread":0.2279923967648344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}