{"id":"W36457722","doi":"10.5414/alx02333e","title":"The Admissibility of Graphics and Presentations as Demonstrative Aids in Canadian Court Proceedings","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Jury; Demonstrative; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205125,0.00006252075,0.00009135505,0.00007513841,0.0009266972,0.0001154185,0.0001302127,0.00005802307,0.00002638136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001045124,0.00004708671,0.00003708973,0.0002453783,0.000481362,0.0005438825,0.000006970208,0.0002440464,0.000002142842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008656852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008139289,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1217601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3892367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988282,0.000108292,0.0002096927,0.00006655099,0.0003439334,0.000443314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986652,0.00031306,0.0001078736,0.00004505005,0.000285552,0.000583242],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002590091,0.00003068072,0.8018084,0.000007006232,0.00001167934,0.000002768681,0.05284615,3.429139e-7,0.00002229117,0.1416766,0.002980631,0.0005875172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003070966,0.0001238443,0.6451995,0.0001104849,0.00007121562,0.0002414651,0.1322311,0.00002889369,0.00007107229,0.0303872,0.1909952,0.0002329199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.984314,0.001546328,0.000008603534,0.002859245,0.0001638445,0.0001215738,0.000003860693,0.000003919114,0.01097864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979374,0.001636006,0.00007624579,0.0001024102,0.0001362503,0.000003475391,2.037528e-7,0.000003346595,0.0001046679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2674766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840882,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03459947066285354,"score_gpt":0.3473230870400769,"score_spread":0.3127236163772233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}