{"id":"W36825135","doi":"10.1002/ece3.9826","title":"Notes on the statistical analysis of some loomweights from Pompeii","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archeologia e Calcolatori","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Mathematical Sciences; Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Surprise; Archaeology; Point (geometry); Variety (cybernetics); Excavation; Field (mathematics); History; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02908552,0.001157737,0.001231784,0.00282421,0.002900783,0.002148282,0.002697255,0.001074775,0.03707622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2435087,0.0005064356,0.00214216,0.006186991,0.0041329,0.002441728,0.002085138,0.004258152,0.003590851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001364749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001552674,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01693079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03278603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9769989,0.01469475,0.001394519,0.002124552,0.00414238,0.0006449686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8260628,0.150346,0.004055292,0.009267199,0.009715304,0.0005534771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009747825,0.00006546886,0.02508098,0.00113536,0.001106145,0.00263773,0.009349642,0.001924656,0.00190535,0.06742404,0.6498975,0.2384983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001451456,0.0004727412,0.1626702,0.001054591,0.001078931,0.00146821,0.007053581,0.0138348,0.007529536,0.1120057,0.6922386,0.0004478219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1036923,0.009146384,0.6644093,0.0773383,0.07327645,0.0007665703,0.02174459,0.006568865,0.04305723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.640864,0.003677004,0.2683512,0.01299768,0.01013142,0.001887332,0.007211662,0.007977308,0.04690237],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03707622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1538208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05565304314236617,"score_gpt":0.295540165278029,"score_spread":0.2398871221356629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}