{"id":"W37074671","doi":"10.1088/1752-7163/acce34","title":"Mill’s On Liberty and Argumentation Theory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Breath Research","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Dialectic; Epistemology; Argumentation theory; Denial; Argument (complex analysis); Mill; Meaning (existential); Infallibility; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007306761,0.000952518,0.001178506,0.00241076,0.004114407,0.007277255,0.001460373,0.004745749,0.01846105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145887,0.0004384397,0.001513381,0.001576442,0.03041959,0.01216896,0.004338461,0.005589538,0.003279323],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002442153,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001324151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928178,0.003904682,0.0004703276,0.001330225,0.0009802829,0.0004967251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899193,0.007409242,0.0004216374,0.001032509,0.0009588254,0.0002585033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005962022,0.000002251174,0.00004081941,0.00002906042,0.000005505667,0.00002866007,0.0002828682,0.0001165733,0.00001436797,0.9933021,0.003740893,0.002430996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007860704,0.000003999942,0.00003348433,0.00004437802,0.000003160216,0.00003869665,0.00008405005,0.0002976053,0.00003194781,0.9605568,0.03889308,0.000004886615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009706666,0.02455663,0.1544525,0.09870101,0.004483794,0.0001308234,0.0004979863,0.0002971915,0.7071735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7817994,0.01397051,0.06533179,0.02107283,0.006418581,0.0007197654,0.000403345,0.0004606824,0.109823],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01846105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06175834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1169278360891665,"score_gpt":0.4968098323381848,"score_spread":0.3798819962490183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}