{"id":"W37637453","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000020","title":"Understanding and predicting the affordances of visual logics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Notation; Affordance; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Cognitive dimensions of notations; Existentialism; Programming language; Cognitive science; Human–computer interaction; Theoretical computer science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Epistemology; Cognition; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002662803,0.0000309239,0.00004071112,0.00001968694,0.00007130885,0.00004795687,0.0001508677,0.00001088873,0.000007526901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002764771,0.00001783354,0.000009075181,0.0001388036,0.0000415335,0.0003494497,0.0001225984,0.00002174638,0.000001231051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006361944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006993533,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003291063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002236142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996629,0.00001675231,0.00007941714,0.00005279403,0.00009798512,0.00009016183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997626,0.00007169766,0.00004155039,0.00008495231,0.00001111813,0.00002810163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[2.021941e-7,0.00001480254,0.03159599,0.000005510569,0.000004221034,5.221422e-8,0.0005748604,0.000008751069,0.0000374696,0.9667199,0.0003391896,0.0006990715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002532087,0.00008394567,0.008292364,0.00002961021,0.00001616752,0.00001256887,0.005860252,0.9630134,0.002578939,0.01603779,0.003642557,0.0001791687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006273621,0.00006994503,0.9884029,0.0002145022,0.00008312299,0.00002260586,6.020825e-7,0.00002844603,0.004904264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951503,0.00003003427,0.004519746,0.0001809402,0.00002726508,2.523438e-7,6.261451e-7,0.000001170583,0.00008965757],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07272305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1347331699333631,"score_gpt":0.333161032686443,"score_spread":0.1984278627530799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}