{"id":"W37918926","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076833","title":"A organização do conhecimento para o acesso universal. As contribuições de Otlet, Bradford, Ranganathan, Dahlberg e Lancaster","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Information Science and Libraries","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Knowledge organization; Thesaurus; Information retrieval; Search engine indexing; Hierarchy; Controlled vocabulary; Information science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004324226,0.0002210968,0.0002532491,0.000312077,0.0003502298,0.001122181,0.001423724,0.0001860587,0.0009829234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009049792,0.0002190445,0.00009133148,0.0009649292,0.000238047,0.005553674,0.0003791384,0.0002248086,0.001304475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001523813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004277905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005887717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002966147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982317,0.0001843472,0.000203235,0.0003445707,0.0004020488,0.0006340963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984941,0.0003284747,0.0001758846,0.0005302698,0.000169099,0.0003022024],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005348702,0.0001098319,0.008422262,0.00003281199,0.0001265924,0.0002774833,0.03899345,0.0000899226,0.002235061,0.8477377,0.08549333,0.0164281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005816446,0.0003120368,0.03759298,0.0000924429,0.00006473227,0.0002962071,0.01486605,0.02561661,0.01038972,0.02371169,0.8798093,0.001431745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6907582,0.0002480185,0.1435803,0.009883648,0.0004700684,0.0007262058,0.00002708528,0.0005971061,0.1537094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855674,0.00007410743,0.004808706,0.003238475,0.00007332278,0.000008442828,0.00001492452,0.00001685113,0.006197785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.824026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008949151835143743,"score_gpt":0.2316916176607154,"score_spread":0.2227424658255716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}