{"id":"W379701528","doi":"","title":"An improvement in the calculation of the magnetic field for an arbitrary geometry coil with rectangular cross section: Research Articles","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields","topic":"Electric Motor Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Geometry; Field (mathematics); Electromagnetic coil; Cross section (physics); Magnetic field; Engineering drawing; Mathematics; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Electrical engineering; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007917729,0.0004433594,0.0005380205,0.0003317015,0.0002902469,0.0004883538,0.001255374,0.0009076691,0.003685488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002598699,0.0002527047,0.0007104658,0.0004026594,0.0004195837,0.000836276,0.000492237,0.0006757418,0.001429576],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003226351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004948308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001472267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001583459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999702,0.00009543198,0.00001528511,0.00004956856,0.0001184579,0.00001916292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989899,0.000362777,0.00006072692,0.0002211672,0.000335817,0.00002965165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007656208,0.0002969515,0.002386086,0.001285093,0.0001680491,0.0006700695,0.0004451629,0.4112836,0.1526943,0.0929231,0.01487253,0.3222094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000694028,0.0001474087,0.001033399,0.00004151759,0.00006877969,0.0002995282,0.00002522394,0.9406613,0.03039686,0.005976683,0.02124541,0.00003465479],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02913541,0.0005540876,0.9556026,0.0004912168,0.0003360729,0.00008915421,0.00007661102,0.001448704,0.012266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3082526,0.00064658,0.6792205,0.0003359832,0.0002690717,0.0001196739,0.0001114926,0.0007864173,0.01025775],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003685488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01232916,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01741980200054027,"score_gpt":0.2888974337707303,"score_spread":0.2714776317701901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}