{"id":"W403438579","doi":"10.1023/a:1008123613298","title":"Diatom-environmental relationships in 64 alkaline southeastern Ontario (Canada) lakes: a diatom-based model for water quality reconstructions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Paleolimnology","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Ministry of Environment","keywords":"Diatom; Eutrophication; Canonical correspondence analysis; Phosphorus; Paleolimnology; Chlorophyll a; Nutrient; Environmental science; Ecology; Botany; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental chemistry; Biology; Chemistry; Geology; Species richness","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007115664,0.0001527992,0.0003428638,0.00008380435,0.0001276745,0.00001136906,0.0002004075,0.0001461299,0.0007713465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004265733,0.0001221883,0.000113105,0.00006358096,0.0001081609,0.0001384042,0.00003495462,0.0003965448,0.00002938087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005299837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001727646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04548924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982356,0.0001588769,0.0008305584,0.0001899777,0.0002478801,0.0003371289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991238,0.0001727096,0.0003653487,0.0001984877,0.00001065811,0.0001290175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009415501,0.00008943656,0.9124364,0.000006628979,0.00001843553,0.00001626731,0.0007151906,0.08596887,0.0003445288,0.00008043165,0.00008101735,0.0001486341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003316776,0.0002157549,0.5760415,0.00004688545,0.00006946595,0.0003905969,0.001070981,0.4068156,0.00007454313,0.005097449,0.00641618,0.0004443019],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801785,0.00001973061,0.01815733,0.0006333421,0.0002613831,0.0001919985,0.00005085242,0.000005145952,0.0005017447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971754,0.00000744622,0.001888542,0.0001487721,0.00005656925,0.00001327474,0.00001987034,0.00001297408,0.0006771841],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9379481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9608669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02757721501615664,"score_gpt":0.2306491144182149,"score_spread":0.2030718994020583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}