{"id":"W404768537","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.023","title":"Empirical characterisation of ranges of mainstream smoke toxicant yields from contemporary cigarette products using quantile regression methodology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; British American Tobacco; World Health Organization","keywords":"Toxicant; Quantile regression; Linear regression; Sidestream smoke; Percentile; tar (computing); Environmental health; Statistics; Smoke; Toxicology; Environmental science; Cigarette smoke; Mathematics; Computer science; Chemistry; Medicine; Engineering; Biology; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009745243,0.0004681727,0.0004693222,0.001591858,0.0002281673,0.0009040181,0.0009184551,0.0006557741,0.001593624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02915882,0.0002164631,0.0008530839,0.001760384,0.0007964525,0.00103848,0.0009126224,0.001009682,0.0003431111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005857872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000332071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974309,0.001391967,0.0001431496,0.000503087,0.0003968792,0.0001340603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794617,0.0156841,0.001887109,0.001832525,0.001005759,0.0001287612],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006015785,0.0002836639,0.4759283,0.0004113043,0.0006500357,0.0006348868,0.001564086,0.3238204,0.01444151,0.03067776,0.001903356,0.1490831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002011675,0.0003410515,0.2646061,0.00007223012,0.00008145942,0.0004905413,0.0006382878,0.7052322,0.006543632,0.01869123,0.00320636,0.00007677814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6411511,0.0005781869,0.3538947,0.0002109326,0.00001515176,0.00009541067,0.001369171,0.0004392542,0.002246123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685594,0.0001950096,0.02925987,0.00003341089,0.00001422804,0.0000668347,0.001376336,0.00005181181,0.0004430613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009745243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05153835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4412931877232775,"score_gpt":0.4718706323445271,"score_spread":0.03057744462124956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}