{"id":"W405605639","doi":"10.22621/cfn.v118i3.5","title":"Presence of Cavities in Snags Retained in Forest Cutblocks: Do Management Policies Promote Species Retention?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Field-Naturalist","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Snag; Habitat; Biodiversity; Forest management; Forest ecology; Excavator; Environmental science; Coarse woody debris; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Ecology; Ecosystem; Forestry; Agroforestry; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258767,0.0001063472,0.0001938121,0.0004319791,0.0004822016,0.0007561049,0.0004632037,0.0004894012,0.001769748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004970195,0.0001296765,0.0001234511,0.0004416553,0.0008233026,0.0006817976,0.0003516754,0.0003137905,0.0001531702],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008582135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001247887,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06609457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2729055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995146,0.0001194959,0.00002312434,0.00008528574,0.00009095996,0.0001665801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951594,0.001117423,0.002312772,0.0002016956,0.0005556034,0.0006530894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000631825,0.00006194514,0.9895419,0.00002166594,0.00002745076,0.00006161596,0.0003670458,0.0001386251,0.0005529952,0.0002198592,0.0002175494,0.008726102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001352246,0.00002068427,0.9992378,0.000008299591,0.000005533963,0.00002320922,0.0003469408,0.00008783794,0.00004076702,0.00005412726,0.0001718028,0.000001613852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977229,0.0002473951,0.0001183531,0.0002472177,0.000005205986,0.000007939778,0.00006340104,0.000002666138,0.001584862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995732,0.00009175729,0.00007974095,0.00004093391,0.000005012442,0.000002652395,0.00002331899,8.864115e-7,0.0001825198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9339054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1314197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01826574487685686,"score_gpt":0.2035019380957401,"score_spread":0.1852361932188832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}