{"id":"W415698283","doi":"10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030127","title":"(Re)Considering the Scholarship of Learning: Inviting the Elephant in the Room to Tea","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Teaching and learning center; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01036586,0.000442682,0.0004131046,0.001389164,0.006322145,0.01420719,0.001367677,0.003756445,0.00472635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01815215,0.0001928247,0.0006414521,0.0007542572,0.03766516,0.02248907,0.01260506,0.007110638,0.0009234309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003433953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00520546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00151459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00260466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989553,0.008509723,0.0001413019,0.0003759554,0.0009543097,0.0004656988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905866,0.00665885,0.0004584629,0.000836389,0.0006436903,0.0008160555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003198268,0.00005099099,0.0006005982,0.0001288376,0.000004173498,0.0002615749,0.13957,0.0002694259,0.0006033776,0.8197755,0.009064724,0.02963869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002007224,0.0001162161,0.0003436389,0.000461975,0.000009529189,0.0003303366,0.1449665,0.001081391,0.000890879,0.4861656,0.3655903,0.00002355503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1350468,0.008584845,0.1315204,0.3969903,0.00722363,0.0001871391,0.00004662372,0.0003955836,0.3200048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9188899,0.003679391,0.02561519,0.01520182,0.001177619,0.0002607784,0.00002313789,0.0002650708,0.03488699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9896342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05482054,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1416361686273553,"score_gpt":0.4619994209671904,"score_spread":0.3203632523398351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}