{"id":"W4200010586","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0261467","title":"Conservatism predicts aversion to consequential Artificial Intelligence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Risk aversion (psychology); Cognitive reframing; Perception; Intervention (counseling); Preference; Psychology; Test (biology); Skepticism; Cognitive psychology; Function (biology); Social psychology; Loss aversion; Politics; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Political science; Microeconomics; Epistemology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003407622,0.0001855768,0.0002633156,0.0005935724,0.0004117013,0.001575886,0.0002067615,0.0005654074,0.004203867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02160442,0.0002322872,0.0002376527,0.0002592838,0.0009172357,0.0005287671,0.0007485746,0.001423184,0.0003570241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005175117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002794893,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001640509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00274581,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992323,0.000309358,0.00007336505,0.0001055631,0.0001894398,0.00009006499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746961,0.01045646,0.009190697,0.002601492,0.00107309,0.001982125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006585452,0.001840778,0.9763882,0.00004354422,0.000119543,0.0001371268,0.00285673,0.0007312429,0.005668348,0.001239954,0.0004734467,0.00984244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000193316,0.0002840181,0.9939633,0.00001512649,0.00003050796,0.0001094443,0.0009564262,0.002049521,0.0005888483,0.001618444,0.0003492568,0.00001570014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985076,0.00001917417,0.0001522461,0.00007651545,0.000003073414,0.000006477053,0.000009646926,0.000002403003,0.00122282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993163,0.00002830691,0.000170559,0.00003653452,0.000002593524,0.000006717513,0.00003093116,0.000001786101,0.0004061756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004203867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01802146,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3171994824316828,"score_gpt":0.2924814611123162,"score_spread":0.02471802131936662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}