{"id":"W4200018421","doi":"10.13111/2066-8201.2021.13.4.10","title":"Morphing Winglet Design for Aerodynamic Performance Optimization of the CRJ-700 Aircraft. Part 1 – Structural Design","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INCAS BULLETIN","topic":"Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morphing; Wingtip device; Aerodynamics; Aerospace engineering; Software; Structural engineering; Wing; Computer science; Engineering; Simulation; Computer graphics (images)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002055132,0.0003463074,0.0002350314,0.0003283322,0.0001337187,0.0003091054,0.0003443489,0.00029877,0.001948748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002098733,0.000143574,0.0003505166,0.0001466834,0.0001739233,0.000147966,0.0002162253,0.0002393708,0.0003689408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000200516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002820739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005710059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008741149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999009,0.00001748338,0.000003111913,0.00001291472,0.00005460533,0.00001094533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99994,0.00001240572,0.00001195525,0.000009055073,0.00002144398,0.000005171859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000125533,0.00008350559,0.001730207,0.0002476058,0.00002946931,0.0001895306,0.0001179859,0.6709653,0.187756,0.007044367,0.001189105,0.1305214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001885507,0.00049837,0.002115499,0.000020266,0.00002681298,0.0002007388,0.00004155981,0.9613441,0.02395637,0.001137165,0.01062744,0.00001287428],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1910634,0.0004155863,0.7866597,0.00009884534,0.00005459028,0.0001677447,0.0001483816,0.0003851749,0.02100658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7937233,0.0003376559,0.1997561,0.00003758798,0.00002038076,0.0001630549,0.0002239765,0.0001065602,0.005631465],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001948748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006519198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0173099734761709,"score_gpt":0.1958217583997503,"score_spread":0.1785117849235794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}