{"id":"W4200046301","doi":"10.1108/jal-11-2021-0004","title":"Accounting for intangible assets – insights from meta-analysis of R&D research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Literature","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalization; Book value; Intangible asset; Originality; Accounting; Empirical evidence; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Business; Asset (computer security); Empirical research; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Earnings","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08366631,0.001581995,0.006204102,0.02417593,0.0004641206,0.006645672,0.002285311,0.001449254,0.002249604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2529328,0.000840225,0.01331927,0.01540107,0.001546852,0.003719757,0.00223219,0.001852553,0.0002691846],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002774574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005989657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003035986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9517786,0.02630125,0.01120372,0.004214261,0.006043355,0.0004588101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5321611,0.4027619,0.034148,0.01841339,0.01131473,0.001200913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009671447,0.0001151492,0.03835819,0.2970704,0.3790438,0.0002753492,0.0009842003,0.004210987,0.0007159284,0.006948527,0.003158222,0.2681522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003390285,0.0007896605,0.05632844,0.256141,0.6077589,0.0009578313,0.001139815,0.003137369,0.002330382,0.03320563,0.03759717,0.0002748733],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007939266,0.9819181,0.006433443,0.001669807,0.0002316469,0.0001523642,0.0008061933,0.00004907317,0.0007999508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3949524,0.5783725,0.02077598,0.002023262,0.0008622197,0.0006748234,0.001967794,0.0001012292,0.0002696929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08366631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.442475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1013837506271092,"score_gpt":0.3351241864219328,"score_spread":0.2337404357948237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}