{"id":"W4200046301","doi":"10.1108/jal-11-2021-0004","title":"Accounting for intangible assets – insights from meta-analysis of R&D research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting Literature","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalization; Book value; Intangible asset; Originality; Accounting; Empirical evidence; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Business; Asset (computer security); Empirical research; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Earnings","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002113532,0.0002867787,0.001487421,0.002609689,0.00034336,0.001488907,0.0006017043,0.0002338092,0.001170515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001691485,0.0002075247,0.00240055,0.006974764,0.00006173189,0.003201557,0.0002363109,0.0007879194,0.00003541153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004870702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001118653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001369944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002522235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967722,0.00006101399,0.001217202,0.0003684407,0.001160839,0.000420261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894956,0.0007669389,0.001358996,0.0004359241,0.007916988,0.00002556791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001929072,0.001894007,0.03998742,0.003102145,0.6132314,0.0004433148,0.01370072,0.008074847,0.1121744,0.02870684,0.1725962,0.004159634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001682053,0.0001128805,0.008237283,0.0005401192,0.3274494,0.00003618106,0.003668578,0.01445704,0.009248951,0.03312558,0.6000825,0.001359514],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774076,0.01691332,0.0007407925,0.001282379,0.0005401289,0.0001486714,0.00006204577,0.00002150925,0.002883542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992668,0.00009151493,0.002061308,0.001304477,0.002750424,0.000008243031,0.000311436,0.00003730951,0.0007672769],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4274862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1013837506271092,"score_gpt":0.3351241864219328,"score_spread":0.2337404357948237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}