{"id":"W4200091980","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2021.184","title":"<i>In situ</i> treatment technologies for pit latrines to mitigate groundwater contamination by fecal pathogens: a review of recent technical advances","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Grand Challenges Canada","keywords":"Sanitation; Latrine; Environmental science; Groundwater; Pit latrine; Contamination; Waste management; Groundwater contamination; Fecal coliform; Environmental engineering; Water quality; Engineering; Ecology; Aquifer; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010094,0.0002713292,0.001106393,0.0001645004,0.00006358665,0.0000305527,0.0001632111,0.0001321383,0.00004441703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001549452,0.0001664534,0.0002135323,0.0001857559,0.00005322526,0.0002312846,0.00008432475,0.00008735045,0.000004870492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005485559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006522011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002295768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004880623,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978617,0.0001139383,0.001234595,0.0002885521,0.0002755574,0.000225627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990119,0.00013946,0.0004950512,0.0001102978,0.0001753957,0.00006790261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002648765,0.0001796441,0.00001399774,0.00793234,0.0000411248,0.000004365923,0.000298713,7.12275e-7,0.0005043239,0.0000262907,0.0009494844,0.9900225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005759026,0.0004968407,0.00003485149,0.007901623,0.0001541777,0.00002478236,0.00007408017,4.888275e-7,0.006613058,0.00008447772,0.9838184,0.0002213432],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009655852,0.991037,0.003838908,0.001823745,0.0002013711,0.002034552,0.00004064697,0.00001363116,0.00004461917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002278515,0.9865534,0.01213347,0.0001859361,0.00001710256,0.0004026614,0.0001859995,0.00001819794,0.0002754279],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6787774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0432830770862952,"score_gpt":0.3350232072938155,"score_spread":0.2917401302075203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}