{"id":"W4200222103","doi":"10.14221/ajte.2021v46n10.1","title":"The Role of Individual Preferences in the Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in an English for Academic Purposes Writing Course","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œAustralian journal of teacher education","topic":"Student Assessment and Feedback","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Corrective feedback; Psychology; Mathematics education; Qualitative research; Test (biology); Qualitative property; Control (management); English as a foreign language; Treatment and control groups; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003967816,0.00008887795,0.0001801743,0.00007067044,0.0001844023,0.0001146284,0.0008321324,0.00008941424,0.0000273966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003734279,0.00005411964,0.00008692325,0.0004228251,0.0002329039,0.0003301936,0.0000235474,0.000515822,3.892974e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006955619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008876111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001922014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001420931,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977494,0.0008478369,0.0005529931,0.0001070769,0.0005277899,0.0002148368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978598,0.0008773212,0.0006223967,0.0001256656,0.0004709826,0.00004382645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005724705,0.0005967791,0.672981,0.000006937191,0.00003899268,3.379061e-7,0.274497,0.00001417086,0.0002013444,0.00107504,0.001129554,0.04940161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002400403,0.00006301012,0.5284528,0.0000726858,0.0000451616,0.000001495028,0.4683336,0.000001801037,0.000133651,0.001284469,0.001331074,0.00004021981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951665,0.0006887704,0.000001382262,0.002220365,0.0004996332,0.0003576467,0.000003814133,0.000002438884,0.001059469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987184,0.00009472485,0.00009725574,0.00003175388,0.0007179003,0.00002017319,0.000004796685,0.000005943517,0.000309017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1938366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2241019,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05189781943817671,"score_gpt":0.3935110894213582,"score_spread":0.3416132699831815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}