{"id":"W4200253893","doi":"10.3758/s13420-021-00499-w","title":"Reaction to novelty as a behavioral assay of recognition memory in homing pigeons and Japanese quail","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning & Behavior","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quail; Novelty; Psychology; Preference; Object (grammar); Homing (biology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Ecology; Social psychology; Statistics; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002036253,0.0004623849,0.0003295527,0.0005051293,0.0002847011,0.0004281952,0.0002774759,0.0006996115,0.001406151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561509,0.0002523116,0.000329813,0.0001162967,0.0007630003,0.0004722765,0.0003417755,0.001202633,0.0001910755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004230846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003083022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003418778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005345646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998324,0.00002437732,0.00001200757,0.00007400307,0.00002197488,0.00003528973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992033,0.0001023548,0.0002178426,0.00006382245,0.00005181247,0.0003608516],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002483027,0.000398674,0.0397318,0.00006009484,0.00006048651,0.0002086832,0.0004568099,0.00009085047,0.9535534,0.0001348549,0.00007194861,0.002749419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001185346,0.00593486,0.8303765,0.00001518604,0.0001187208,0.0005987725,0.0008311064,0.001885429,0.1595056,0.0001869974,0.0003683587,0.00005982351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995461,0.00006959632,0.0001144094,0.00002475425,0.00001241855,0.000005355367,0.00004004982,0.000005473678,0.0001818059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976953,0.00007820371,0.000378495,0.00007967385,0.00001268604,0.00003136397,0.0002003319,0.00001105425,0.001512881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003418778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006797731,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03908334218165476,"score_gpt":0.2784896510967433,"score_spread":0.2394063089150886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}