{"id":"W4200317213","doi":"10.1111/ecog.05694","title":"A quantitative review of abundance‐based species distribution models","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Norges Forskningsråd; Biodiversa+","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Relative abundance distribution; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Rank abundance curve; Species distribution; Relative species abundance; Environmental science; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000315208,0.0003579192,0.001474104,0.00006225116,0.00008426011,0.0000260615,0.0003448206,0.0001514619,0.05449129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007577835,0.000305288,0.001303087,0.001671393,0.0003446684,0.0001278594,0.0001391616,0.0002034371,0.0003907294],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003364884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000490138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002671151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003093214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979081,0.0001954319,0.0006838576,0.0004777715,0.0004411247,0.0002937671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986877,0.0001172478,0.000561419,0.0004848358,0.00004842723,0.0001003558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001108375,0.0008268767,0.00009140511,0.2187139,0.0004044749,0.00003524261,0.00006014345,0.00001159164,0.000002768451,0.03165254,0.3762358,0.3719542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006722669,0.00004405341,0.00004048782,0.04248065,0.0003341662,0.000003353075,0.00004825058,0.00001010856,0.000002551468,0.0000454348,0.9566364,0.0002872885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002554627,0.9758528,0.000694386,0.00005575121,0.0001567748,0.0005297098,0.003268153,0.00003584887,0.01940402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000004164654,0.9932657,0.0001501828,0.000143339,0.00001576174,0.0001280566,0.006151639,0.00002200889,0.00011913],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5804006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1276854903403828,"score_gpt":0.3465457473766788,"score_spread":0.218860257036296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}