{"id":"W4200345333","doi":"10.1177/14653125211066106","title":"Tooth and root size as determined from 0.25- and 0.30-mm voxel size cone-beam CT imaging when contrasted to micro-CT scans (0.06 mm): An ex vivo study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Orthodontics","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cone beam computed tomography; Voxel; Nuclear medicine; Root resorption; Ex vivo; Medicine; Volume (thermodynamics); Tomography; Computed tomography; Biomedical engineering; Radiology; Resorption; In vivo; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007728199,0.000409778,0.0008933704,0.0001979657,0.0002252977,0.0008709797,0.0003293446,0.00004596753,0.0002883317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009787114,0.0003978219,0.0002266916,0.000324803,0.0001320062,0.0008248673,0.0001866177,0.0005093153,0.00001048092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006698066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001384597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003391615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008321774,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969546,0.0003775549,0.001048947,0.0005167535,0.0006079327,0.0004942552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970817,0.0009228513,0.0005636209,0.000441113,0.0003959824,0.0005947255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001955409,0.0004728471,0.882146,0.00003096795,0.0004948759,0.0111901,0.001319087,0.000006440381,0.09779599,0.000005434585,0.0009027981,0.005439934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007116524,0.0004868565,0.9513046,0.000300339,0.001066442,0.009458301,0.006928211,0.0002182816,0.01934643,0.0002610405,0.002840661,0.0006723567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951118,0.001935206,0.0009652022,0.0002654132,0.0008787949,0.0003242158,0.0001156525,0.00003548693,0.0003682083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911421,0.00006805512,0.007039079,0.0006652062,0.0003495498,0.000002133155,0.000005236802,0.00006671509,0.0006619305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07844955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01486464465856587,"score_gpt":0.2823951856301093,"score_spread":0.2675305409715435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}