{"id":"W4200394163","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2021.12.009","title":"Effectiveness of Coronary Sinus Reducer for Treatment of Refractory Angina: A Meta-analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Pain Management and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Angina; Confidence interval; Coronary sinus; Refractory (planetary science); Quality of life (healthcare); Prospective cohort study; Randomized controlled trial; Internal medicine; Surgery; Myocardial infarction","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003059672,0.001688939,0.01003182,0.001157317,0.0003882145,0.001499896,0.001320491,0.001750642,0.005092314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006611722,0.0008725617,0.02005927,0.001551775,0.000458162,0.0008895891,0.0007482418,0.002464902,0.0003359657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001020752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008716189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005434183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01456918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983265,0.0007285048,0.0003695088,0.0002704932,0.0001789614,0.0001260292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970276,0.002126218,0.0004729099,0.0001099917,0.0001656586,0.00009762635],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03784502,0.0002228189,0.004679631,0.1450761,0.7824754,0.0001552613,0.00009487357,0.0007055332,0.000650308,0.0001594483,0.001061334,0.02687432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009807343,0.001143833,0.007429823,0.006332429,0.9732276,0.0000754254,0.00006336789,0.0002508906,0.0001222368,0.0002095798,0.001301711,0.00003565257],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.03050742,0.9671423,0.0005006681,0.0002425073,0.0003590639,0.0001466423,0.0004707313,0.00003572101,0.000595047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.437939,0.5561505,0.001853137,0.001512015,0.0005768089,0.0002625612,0.0008755254,0.0000331541,0.0007972981],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01003182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01703554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1126611244853691,"score_gpt":0.3635753876746402,"score_spread":0.2509142631892711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}