{"id":"W4200401577","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.12.012","title":"Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physica Medica","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ionization chamber; Dosimetry; Monte Carlo method; Ionization; Laser beam quality; Beam (structure); Photon; Physics; Range (aeronautics); Absorbed dose; Computational physics; Atomic physics; Materials science; Nuclear medicine; Optics; Statistics; Mathematics; Ion; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001428879,0.0005496052,0.0003104566,0.0007835063,0.0003305659,0.0005635937,0.000766723,0.0006054029,0.001279905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00550767,0.0003466143,0.0006999963,0.0007409948,0.000256077,0.0005450542,0.0003452873,0.0003602463,0.0004709478],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001336286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008722349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003293923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003365621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990773,0.0002474242,0.00007254763,0.0001450887,0.0004100979,0.00004751977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974219,0.001423334,0.0003636649,0.0002279448,0.0005408279,0.00002223641],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001465163,0.0002159141,0.05316395,0.001222231,0.0003205777,0.0003036476,0.0005652055,0.7465451,0.1067981,0.004558814,0.001711798,0.08312953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001242736,0.000756171,0.05926143,0.000220615,0.000334093,0.0008190741,0.0001405685,0.6433928,0.2820232,0.002179463,0.01048755,0.0002608442],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5985848,0.004037698,0.3848973,0.0001409737,0.00008396996,0.000364389,0.001381365,0.001680203,0.008829297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9291881,0.0005629495,0.06810254,0.00004612861,0.000005371989,0.0001388557,0.0007097034,0.0003523762,0.0008941416],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003293923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00969553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01613171849181379,"score_gpt":0.322626849992738,"score_spread":0.3064951315009242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}