{"id":"W4200423674","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6970","title":"Scientific Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR Panel) on testing and interpretation of comparative in vitro metabolism studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EFSA Journal","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"In vivo; Metabolite; Animal testing; In vitro toxicology; In vitro; Pharmacology; Toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Toxicology; Biology; Biotechnology; Computational biology; Chemistry; Biochemistry; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004748249,0.00008322846,0.000168151,0.00002586616,0.0005806704,0.00009083809,0.00007055282,0.00002995146,0.000002295707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002804468,0.00002352067,0.00003116248,0.0005677056,0.0003469643,0.000131173,0.00005177807,0.0001518791,2.351719e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001604631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001601924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000192778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001657708,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990838,0.000218819,0.0002315675,0.0001902801,0.0001774324,0.00009807453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991785,0.0002313373,0.0002257427,0.00003593913,0.0003043431,0.00002419539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009458487,0.00007134744,0.0005208255,0.00001687069,0.00001851622,4.572018e-7,0.003529968,0.0001991393,0.9677411,0.0001297771,0.00005407164,0.02762336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001319702,0.0001235922,0.6521147,0.0004204537,0.000008329926,0.00004911292,0.0057023,0.00043425,0.3396745,0.001000853,0.0002682938,0.00007158607],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963938,0.001114798,0.000001119648,0.001841943,0.0003970939,0.0001951318,0.00002715622,0.000004268235,0.00002467461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996957,0.00004439747,0.00006092207,0.000007810586,0.00009549078,0.000003820698,0.00001037934,3.633006e-7,0.00008107212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6515939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4466106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1458747886022418,"score_gpt":0.2681474338392868,"score_spread":0.122272645237045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}