{"id":"W4200430889","doi":"10.1111/cobi.13876","title":"A mixed methodology for evaluating use of evidence in conservation planning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Conservation science; Management science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001199539,0.00007380363,0.0002043549,0.0000466113,0.00007891766,0.000004595317,0.00006643544,0.0001205028,0.0001100311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008687107,0.00006846787,0.00003286553,0.0002422838,0.0002146588,0.000164302,0.00008595905,0.00006800485,0.000006447801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005271015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005040175,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002135584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002157716,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985794,0.0006106375,0.0003673128,0.0002461897,0.00004627497,0.0001501308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993965,0.005596318,0.0002068689,0.0001164117,0.0001001529,0.00001525904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005921442,0.00002053466,0.9291207,0.0000156728,0.00001237075,0.000001023165,0.0003648913,0.002459873,0.06239818,0.004059461,0.0003420424,0.001146083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004167102,0.0001223559,0.9310234,0.00003717398,0.00001523449,0.000004490189,0.0001775193,0.05411107,0.00294834,0.01004621,0.00100909,0.00008845468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339415,0.0001303239,0.06153302,0.003936794,0.0001792272,0.0002089701,0.000005976787,0.00001184658,0.00005238205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743894,0.00003682658,0.1229197,0.002255667,0.000008326473,0.0001040935,0.00005415537,0.000005204204,0.0002267259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06138665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996631,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6770900108940706,"score_gpt":0.4576834824727418,"score_spread":0.2194065284213289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}