{"id":"W4200430889","doi":"10.1111/cobi.13876","title":"A mixed methodology for evaluating use of evidence in conservation planning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Conservation science; Management science; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Business; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5269077,0.004577483,0.008960745,0.05939188,0.007444708,0.01381063,0.008546556,0.006882845,0.01787139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6183191,0.003296877,0.01178923,0.03458515,0.0113415,0.008177051,0.01558682,0.005866153,0.002297728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01895254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03458956,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004851679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007503763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.227605,0.6570285,0.06857688,0.01506732,0.03008119,0.001641156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1711443,0.6937014,0.0374078,0.04841598,0.0472168,0.002113703],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003967753,0.001225729,0.01018886,0.1549411,0.01121009,0.001363292,0.05678121,0.008033305,0.003355561,0.1455698,0.01356288,0.5898004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006296962,0.009954219,0.01719122,0.1450838,0.01275779,0.001321033,0.04721921,0.03268698,0.01243614,0.430788,0.2826893,0.001575287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01318339,0.01229431,0.6104043,0.003778335,0.001542138,0.3378143,0.004503504,0.0009608909,0.01551885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01397183,0.0009624582,0.6726181,0.0005420753,0.00006780466,0.3111072,0.0003368691,0.00005594063,0.0003378088],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4730923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5834071,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6770900108940706,"score_gpt":0.4576834824727418,"score_spread":0.2194065284213289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}