{"id":"W4200551038","doi":"10.1007/s40271-021-00560-w","title":"The Application of Preference Elicitation Methods in Clinical Trial Design to Quantify Trade-Offs: A Scoping Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Patient","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta; McGill University Health Centre; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Preference elicitation; Preference; Checklist; Context (archaeology); Clinical study design; Clinical trial; Sample size determination; Research design; Stakeholder; Medicine; Weighting; Applied psychology; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1865086,0.002851943,0.01323957,0.008161349,0.000734374,0.007425877,0.00396279,0.003976634,0.007449558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3547162,0.001370071,0.01337041,0.009613569,0.002075192,0.004690594,0.00336394,0.004058607,0.0006427948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004593013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008082147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002482666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005036071,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8173354,0.1423071,0.02243126,0.003427311,0.01379028,0.0007085678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4047723,0.5676363,0.01438073,0.005152958,0.007624377,0.0004333525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001403228,0.0001461221,0.0007590633,0.4614454,0.02330934,0.00005619686,0.0003474213,0.00184185,0.0002567024,0.005037714,0.002757191,0.5026399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00351215,0.00304252,0.006096873,0.7300657,0.1321364,0.0006095422,0.0007855826,0.007602994,0.001477109,0.03800677,0.07622849,0.0004358248],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00104329,0.9782679,0.0160698,0.000851768,0.0003177453,0.00207728,0.000387281,0.00004437612,0.0009405204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02988608,0.9167675,0.04442379,0.00184794,0.0004006246,0.005785399,0.0004239008,0.00004739346,0.0004172218],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9863636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8901315090648739,"score_gpt":0.6622149726479275,"score_spread":0.2279165364169464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}