{"id":"W4200606602","doi":"10.1080/08873631.2021.2011683","title":"Evaluating the efficacy of GIS maps as boundary objects: unpacking the limits and opportunities of Indigenous knowledge in forest and natural resource management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Geography","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Boundary object; Boundary (topology); Traditional knowledge; Knowledge management; Natural resource management; Geographic information system; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Concreteness; Natural resource; Indigenous; Process (computing); Geography; Data science; Ecology; Remote sensing; Sociology; Environmental science; Cartography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1364148,0.0007661427,0.0007570299,0.005592009,0.003766283,0.01268484,0.002080096,0.002361933,0.002427446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3863279,0.0007102513,0.001124789,0.004413565,0.01431157,0.02318782,0.01010296,0.002588137,0.0002888523],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004833932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00591961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007025801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01084633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8641185,0.1059977,0.005888927,0.00395695,0.01777889,0.002259154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4914457,0.4467482,0.02320055,0.01607561,0.01911719,0.003412778],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002742962,0.003202094,0.3507452,0.002695051,0.0006700947,0.0004279973,0.2264697,0.012624,0.00215574,0.1005337,0.001518746,0.2962148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001012016,0.01206071,0.3394273,0.006641056,0.002209673,0.0004629972,0.3608203,0.08929697,0.01055717,0.1410483,0.03574537,0.0007181437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579508,0.000650492,0.01019257,0.001237611,0.00005617834,0.0007432742,0.00006087966,0.00002461028,0.02908347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873723,0.0002360212,0.01131845,0.0001022325,0.00001853679,0.0005829733,0.00003257287,0.00001705023,0.0003198768],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7214389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04130885199358575,"score_gpt":0.2803442256952053,"score_spread":0.2390353737016196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}