{"id":"W4205627025","doi":"10.1007/s13762-021-03904-z","title":"Reviewing the ecological footprints of Africa top carbon consumer: a quantile on quantile analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Quantile; Footprint; Energy consumption; Consumption (sociology); Environmental quality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Quality (philosophy); Quantile regression; Estimation; Ecology; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sustainable development; Biology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001653777,0.0002408084,0.0004366814,0.001695956,0.0003366066,0.001186117,0.0004747228,0.0004429973,0.003090162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106242,0.0001129958,0.0004735394,0.004038739,0.0005718913,0.00143187,0.0004729374,0.001203492,0.0002809603],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001268316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000890032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0213409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01846456,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995186,0.0001997866,0.00001968097,0.00007018595,0.0001275393,0.00006425323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954618,0.002467788,0.000358955,0.0002138852,0.001387771,0.0001097701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002527243,0.0001253859,0.1983633,0.001055673,0.0006832001,0.0006566695,0.002070577,0.08170691,0.001742754,0.2282379,0.0861542,0.3989508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001986743,0.0001939835,0.491772,0.001391119,0.0005114698,0.0003885147,0.01098649,0.08849449,0.002580324,0.2196917,0.1838598,0.000110244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7420115,0.09426858,0.05904131,0.05612906,0.001396428,0.00007224183,0.004787296,0.0001456214,0.042148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790528,0.01344742,0.002438801,0.0009152693,0.0007462673,0.00001269749,0.000785214,0.00004156,0.002559836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0213409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04243338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02158503377532124,"score_gpt":0.2275838002094472,"score_spread":0.2059987664341259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}