{"id":"W4205627025","doi":"10.1007/s13762-021-03904-z","title":"Reviewing the ecological footprints of Africa top carbon consumer: a quantile on quantile analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Quantile; Footprint; Energy consumption; Consumption (sociology); Environmental quality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Quality (philosophy); Quantile regression; Estimation; Ecology; Econometrics; Economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sustainable development; Biology; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001256559,0.00008500954,0.0002905613,0.000740885,0.0001367725,0.00001929623,0.0008719675,0.00003868683,0.0004570529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001578817,0.00007322252,0.00008885652,0.0005006694,0.0006986097,0.00009178848,0.0004559487,0.0002271017,0.000008224418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003419248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001946881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001671346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002351301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987985,0.0000206374,0.0005819607,0.0002530038,0.0001833936,0.0001624622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989066,0.00006527972,0.000777683,0.0001973438,0.00001412086,0.00003895948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000552061,0.0007450378,0.819034,0.00000348266,0.0006600529,0.00004333385,0.0003346159,0.002013451,0.01092311,0.1567486,0.00007915865,0.009359961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001872362,0.001836631,0.8083898,0.00002804595,0.0001984974,0.0003590768,0.003030881,0.006735977,0.01278478,0.03499451,0.1291423,0.0006271081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942852,0.001180102,0.0000298047,0.001807834,0.0002454686,0.00006218601,0.0000360729,0.000003905621,0.002349465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987568,0.0009214365,0.0001288574,0.0001162996,0.00001605942,0.000009143399,9.010941e-7,0.000004541294,0.00004601467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1290631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5004408,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02158503377532124,"score_gpt":0.2275838002094472,"score_spread":0.2059987664341259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}