{"id":"W4205760491","doi":"10.22148/001c.32036","title":"The Humanities in Public: A Computational Analysis of US National and Campus Newspapers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Newspaper; Humanities; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Publics; Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Art; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001883626,0.0002820497,0.000446452,0.007005819,0.002687971,0.004859467,0.001241095,0.001184125,0.005337734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01595564,0.0003498016,0.0007410535,0.01404297,0.001588484,0.004503546,0.002240107,0.001508477,0.0009972625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003588989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001509472,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06929873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07814514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980986,0.0009789768,0.0000951486,0.0002643758,0.0003517737,0.0002110856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718098,0.02384342,0.001774317,0.001122118,0.0009597483,0.0004906264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001134675,0.003825293,0.5997795,0.001101223,0.0006486989,0.003224373,0.05783521,0.02792519,0.002087908,0.08703367,0.09681794,0.1185864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002314746,0.0001860698,0.4046635,0.000285148,0.0003390941,0.001229528,0.1230087,0.3082343,0.002196872,0.03332568,0.1261156,0.0001838848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.974211,0.0006317397,0.00167218,0.003632297,0.00003336742,0.00007856281,0.009033953,0.00017301,0.01053388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722705,0.0004994582,0.006250084,0.0003658073,0.00009904098,0.0001830058,0.01770112,0.00008442479,0.002546389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1377907,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.076590508968831,"score_gpt":0.3698167006261597,"score_spread":0.2932261916573287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}