{"id":"W4205798873","doi":"10.24043/isj.218","title":"Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"African Union","keywords":"CONTEST; Territorial integrity; De facto; Political science; Sovereignty; China; State (computer science); Diplomacy; Independence (probability theory); Territorial dispute; International relations; Political economy; Sovereign state; Development economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001014966,0.00009141394,0.0001938054,0.00002982299,0.002924265,0.0001008989,0.0001142724,0.00004772893,0.00001127367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008999886,0.00005916676,0.00005733955,0.00006851254,0.0003185894,0.00008636138,0.00003113587,0.0002401599,0.000002442504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001451082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003121341,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002169322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003046721,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.0001991125,0.0001868992,0.00009095055,0.0001987933,0.0006997899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999041,0.0004451827,0.0001005586,0.00005936493,0.0001475595,0.0002063255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001595511,0.000008856831,0.6280087,0.00003902086,0.000297892,0.00004927381,0.3071402,0.00001280629,0.000006650234,0.001370868,0.03688701,0.02616274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006918709,0.0001049617,0.06347326,0.00008050128,0.0001061657,0.00008267887,0.1330898,0.00001168331,0.0000234602,0.01353673,0.7885987,0.0002002148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736362,0.005043104,0.0008625622,0.01487465,0.0001870579,0.0001579185,0.00007031646,0.0000257935,0.005142413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882382,0.006255267,0.0005188843,0.0002349196,0.003115501,0.000002802174,8.970104e-7,0.000009445132,0.001624142],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7517117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07584015713531084,"score_gpt":0.3841489760694228,"score_spread":0.3083088189341119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}