{"id":"W4205798873","doi":"10.24043/isj.218","title":"Between De Jure and De Facto Statehood: Revisiting the Status Issue for Taiwan","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island Studies Journal","topic":"Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"African Union","keywords":"CONTEST; Territorial integrity; De facto; Political science; Sovereignty; China; State (computer science); Diplomacy; Independence (probability theory); Territorial dispute; International relations; Political economy; Sovereign state; Development economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00628739,0.0002093668,0.0003834912,0.001659133,0.008234112,0.01722219,0.001415247,0.006150537,0.004559571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01083113,0.0003292177,0.0003865009,0.002188127,0.03003268,0.01641935,0.005703432,0.008504103,0.0002198443],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009290875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01006049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02773344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03376352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979969,0.0008869837,0.0001278642,0.0002758804,0.0002827203,0.0004296788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937262,0.003783442,0.0008227635,0.000362085,0.0008066398,0.0004989849],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001496545,0.000007367553,0.002093071,0.00003850685,0.000003922918,0.0004684243,0.02710615,0.0001241664,0.00009825757,0.9650195,0.001150992,0.003874614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004452959,0.0001102126,0.01258509,0.0009696136,0.00003647438,0.0004436849,0.2239665,0.001372682,0.0005099516,0.5867954,0.1730696,0.00009621777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4703345,0.008680323,0.004971516,0.200625,0.001085724,0.00005382797,0.00008935377,0.00002372657,0.3141361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931903,0.001216509,0.000178332,0.001352884,0.0002403501,0.00001853702,0.00001589851,0.00001072975,0.003776403],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02773344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06741035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07584015713531084,"score_gpt":0.3841489760694228,"score_spread":0.3083088189341119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}