{"id":"W4207055850","doi":"10.4095/225851","title":"Residual total magnetic field, Burntbush area aeromagnetic survey, NTS 42 H/09 (south-east), Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Aeromagnetic survey; Geology; Residual; Magnetic survey; Geochemistry; Magnetic anomaly; Geophysics; Magnetic field; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003574741,0.0004644306,0.0003874338,0.002284898,0.002921443,0.000768725,0.001002269,0.0002727419,0.01407507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001181167,0.0003657908,0.0002194728,0.003489699,0.0004525108,0.0004541713,0.0004594592,0.0004975278,0.004066558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01310182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0263673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994406,0.00002630759,0.00002386204,0.00007566754,0.0003340424,0.00009948615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979394,0.00006356392,0.0001159313,0.00007939574,0.001570877,0.0002307576],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008258102,0.0002655581,0.617786,0.0005009786,0.000122265,0.0006618486,0.003559039,0.002785413,0.007170653,0.001680307,0.2938564,0.07078572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009914203,0.00005065848,0.8901609,0.00005834755,0.00004042349,0.00008118465,0.001731558,0.001213448,0.00165052,0.0001052264,0.1047849,0.00002379123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3841158,0.0007748554,0.001994957,0.001110183,0.0001619667,0.0007958284,0.4687449,0.0006133117,0.1416882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4749517,0.001135395,0.004603703,0.0002485742,0.00008454146,0.0003956724,0.18229,0.0003000055,0.3359905],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01407507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09506083,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04563562279958455,"score_gpt":0.2327324357257123,"score_spread":0.1870968129261277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}