{"id":"W4210305383","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.211115","title":"Post Hoc Power Calculations: An Inappropriate Method for Interpreting the Findings of a Research Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Rheumatology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Medicine; Confidence interval; Type I and type II errors; Post hoc; Statistical power; Odds ratio; Power analysis; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Statistics; Sample (material); Hazard ratio; Post-hoc analysis; Ideal (ethics); Computer science; Mathematics; Internal medicine; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4456273,0.0001170179,0.001846903,0.0005772059,0.0006434727,0.0001419537,0.003404068,0.00003153217,0.002059252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06853683,0.0000408764,0.0007392048,0.001228196,0.0001292924,0.0001310206,0.0004722795,0.0005373693,0.00002287923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003805543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001483799,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009992671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006519532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9028167,0.08263072,0.008827337,0.0003435301,0.005065566,0.0003161789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9376094,0.04964962,0.006786858,0.002133915,0.003744548,0.00007561171],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002814299,0.001771146,0.5345568,0.0001459562,0.004124282,0.0000167824,0.310636,0.006783568,0.001500604,0.04778701,0.06595073,0.02391287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002718798,0.0110718,0.02833517,0.0001799532,0.001289134,0.007338792,0.7439421,0.07149161,0.00007242138,0.08773092,0.04542013,0.0004091401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680311,0.0005240458,0.02578212,0.004407466,0.000265084,0.0008600154,0.00000777396,9.381206e-7,0.0001214426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948685,0.00001022261,0.00463982,0.0001027333,0.000005172207,0.00002502697,3.898301e-7,0.000008280301,0.0003398539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998853,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5943443314800874,"score_gpt":0.5890866698779713,"score_spread":0.005257661602116048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}