{"id":"W4210447483","doi":"10.1002/mrm.29136","title":"Effective magnetic susceptibility of 3D‐printed porous metal scaffolds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Porosity; Materials science; Magnetic susceptibility; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Imaging phantom; Biomedical engineering; Titanium alloy; Gyroid; Titanium; Porous medium; Composite material; Alloy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metallurgy; Chemistry; Medicine; Nuclear medicine; Crystallography; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003901174,0.0002033844,0.0004466303,0.0001823881,0.00004764192,0.000003689485,0.0002983546,0.0000458926,0.002889845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005069979,0.000189811,0.00005190659,0.0005602409,0.0001945769,0.00002492614,0.0001224875,0.0002580901,0.000003899336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001437352,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003762985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001485216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984135,0.0001435935,0.000430593,0.0002872674,0.0004297813,0.0002952485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999315,0.0001346476,0.00003893975,0.0004205622,0.0000329565,0.00005790391],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002891209,0.000159737,0.03363551,0.0004010936,0.00002543413,0.0002337402,0.002890771,0.01168312,0.2135232,0.0003239517,0.00130034,0.735534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00403869,0.003752955,0.9266543,0.00015614,0.0001019763,0.0001473574,0.0008725213,0.03106319,0.008104204,0.001506874,0.0230327,0.0005691414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499885,0.04313198,0.00006322085,0.00007171024,0.000456776,0.0004876345,0.0000120655,0.00008233057,0.005705738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990169,0.000143234,0.0003116051,0.00004328207,0.00007513943,0.00009795423,0.00001342806,0.00002774718,0.0002706605],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8930187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004505826320934892,"score_gpt":0.211658346148912,"score_spread":0.2071525198279771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}