{"id":"W4210485286","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103941","title":"Sedimentary pyrite proxy for atmospheric oxygen: evaluation of strengths and limitations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth-Science Reviews","topic":"Geological and Geochemical Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Pyrite; Proxy (statistics); Atmospheric oxygen; Sedimentary rock; Oxygen; Environmental science; Geology; Environmental chemistry; Geochemistry; Chemistry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009772956,0.001264252,0.001399538,0.001243785,0.0004633337,0.002718824,0.001707016,0.001048129,0.0006079018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008570246,0.0005660102,0.0005344221,0.001974967,0.001151761,0.001407139,0.001037053,0.001382292,0.000241314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001439316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001760946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03089193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03660626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981997,0.0005018772,0.0001560331,0.0005285427,0.0005069754,0.0001069792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914859,0.003994468,0.0008653906,0.0006503361,0.002846642,0.0001572732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001788745,0.000151143,0.487375,0.005346224,0.0039279,0.0003792852,0.0006266887,0.00628934,0.01513079,0.01307573,0.004869442,0.4610398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002123086,0.0008829731,0.7100322,0.003552102,0.005752746,0.001082288,0.001879289,0.03110474,0.05038013,0.02094454,0.1739089,0.0002677497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4142513,0.5398505,0.01659925,0.009144092,0.001481758,0.00008741287,0.004152927,0.0001490266,0.01428367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8157362,0.1670455,0.01165584,0.0007876338,0.0006822568,0.00003625057,0.00158955,0.00005121559,0.002415577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03089193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06142426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04832179904593985,"score_gpt":0.2816437556543932,"score_spread":0.2333219566084533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}