{"id":"W4210572622","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1312706/v1","title":"Extrapolating contaminant effects from individuals to populations: a case study on nanoparticle toxicity to Daphnia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of California, Santa Barbara; UT-Battelle; Battelle; U.S. Department of Energy; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Daphnia; Daphnia magna; Toxicity; Environmental chemistry; Toxicology; Biology; Environmental science; Zoology; Ecology; Chemistry; Zooplankton","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049691,0.0004188254,0.0004023473,0.0002720456,0.00040642,0.0005413164,0.0005658662,0.0008782655,0.000394194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001558046,0.000225337,0.0008716198,0.000342837,0.0003079145,0.0003389888,0.0004754931,0.0007646391,0.0001003302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001142772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004326642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01962822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01945174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996833,0.0001127908,0.00001974234,0.0000941506,0.00006316802,0.00002688253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983757,0.001076162,0.0001291311,0.0001398125,0.000227687,0.00005157117],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000289543,0.0007712131,0.1492569,0.0002736821,0.0003042684,0.002832224,0.0005386501,0.765937,0.05100413,0.0009377445,0.0007706889,0.02708397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005620421,0.0026869,0.05979567,0.00003765076,0.0002598643,0.0006049602,0.0006483836,0.8764724,0.05453066,0.002232437,0.002583494,0.00009136216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924286,0.00009966015,0.006481755,0.0001140678,0.000008072368,0.00003945078,0.0001621894,0.00004684905,0.0006193885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916009,0.0001179802,0.007495792,0.00005043456,0.000004349085,0.00002945109,0.0001081095,0.000008398732,0.00058469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01962822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03902793,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1594641460946127,"score_gpt":0.4526003402264482,"score_spread":0.2931361941318356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}