{"id":"W4210635720","doi":"10.1007/s11273-022-09857-5","title":"Evaluating ecosystem services for agricultural wetlands: a systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Wetlands Ecology and Management","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Global Institute for Water Security; Wildlife Conservation Society Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Global Institute for Water Security, University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Provisioning; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Population; Productivity; Ecology; Computer science; Biology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01414213,0.002409225,0.01095189,0.009365834,0.0006012867,0.003083795,0.002019636,0.001414811,0.003019727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03991813,0.000987306,0.02798684,0.009962765,0.0007985701,0.001839331,0.001552755,0.001332116,0.0002364722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002631497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004206805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009766761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02308174,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919478,0.003609281,0.002298928,0.0009994468,0.0009121459,0.0002323709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684768,0.0251348,0.003553466,0.0007791816,0.001807318,0.0002484265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005698276,0.00003409453,0.01513506,0.5163949,0.4374644,0.0001670954,0.0001426439,0.001058779,0.0002475493,0.0003730264,0.001288289,0.02712426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002436651,0.0001759653,0.01329605,0.07803591,0.9023808,0.0001820479,0.0001156355,0.0005274547,0.0001969706,0.0006366961,0.004165397,0.00004344411],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005992471,0.9909589,0.0009149038,0.0003116307,0.00009106106,0.0001603896,0.001314907,0.00002389268,0.0002317935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.245265,0.7462751,0.004258682,0.0008964471,0.0001939537,0.0008899083,0.001958044,0.00004228292,0.0002205617],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01414213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07479161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06316973834111182,"score_gpt":0.3202581124204753,"score_spread":0.2570883740793635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}