{"id":"W4210734559","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2022.101194","title":"The rubber band effect: Managing the stability-change paradox in routines","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Flexibility (engineering); Interdependence; Salient; Organizational change; Stability (learning theory); Computer science; Closure (psychology); Knowledge management; Sociology; Process management; Epistemology; Business; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Management; Artificial intelligence; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003042218,0.0002025958,0.0002416533,0.0003017685,0.001381697,0.0002765642,0.00083873,0.00001332725,0.0004030896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005131284,0.0001191528,0.0001298165,0.001042443,0.0000911649,0.0005028699,0.0008232961,0.0002880315,0.00002575843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000448727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000849262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980446,0.0001008028,0.0005225939,0.0001983998,0.0007666624,0.0003669747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990051,0.0001446871,0.0004863527,0.0002699617,0.00008058395,0.00001333596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061323,0.0002407892,0.8046444,0.0004859921,0.0005219383,0.0003631382,0.0008970911,0.001108375,0.000004975214,0.0872431,0.03525701,0.06861995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002544181,0.0001105913,0.5627493,0.0001503671,0.0003587647,0.00001646454,0.008715875,0.0005091517,0.00001015814,0.0287883,0.3956267,0.0004202133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7463436,0.01377492,0.0006631794,0.09167814,0.008011825,0.005055577,0.0000077299,0.0001447705,0.1343203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996824,0.0002518494,0.00002049886,0.00132801,0.0007105087,0.00009331871,0.000003831482,0.00002420138,0.0007437766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3603697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999183,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01672622467426976,"score_gpt":0.2136550141764352,"score_spread":0.1969287895021654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}