{"id":"W4210819885","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2021-0035","title":"The bias in judgement: when “naïve” knowledge challenges expert knowledge in criminal trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Normative; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Judicial opinion; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Criminal justice; Social psychology; Management science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Criminology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1253204,0.0003804697,0.001132715,0.004662484,0.00487688,0.01191585,0.002303701,0.006962484,0.003971474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4914159,0.0006295356,0.0006657271,0.002120155,0.02668631,0.01707252,0.01251435,0.005627679,0.0005657605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006004236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003581093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003832018,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8254329,0.1178885,0.008867509,0.009356586,0.0323642,0.006090336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6229743,0.2948938,0.03229795,0.02405141,0.01969387,0.006088756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001329946,0.0003610066,0.111555,0.001443526,0.0003697249,0.004069125,0.2505954,0.002966917,0.002576923,0.3618835,0.01026891,0.25258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001196835,0.0003632407,0.04104615,0.002141343,0.0001162675,0.002589935,0.08328579,0.006144351,0.001709843,0.8410481,0.02119501,0.0002402528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977682,0.004929948,0.07757935,0.07081746,0.001497063,0.0006192878,0.0001019156,0.0001465643,0.1465402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916244,0.0003159316,0.004367485,0.002629282,0.0002099319,0.0001116168,0.00001977303,0.00002026674,0.0007011787],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2656472454443383,"score_gpt":0.4571490882610852,"score_spread":0.1915018428167469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}