{"id":"W4210827762","doi":"10.1038/s41538-022-00127-5","title":"Honey authenticity: the opacity of analytical reports—part 2, forensic evaluative reporting as a potential solution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"npj Science of Food","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Expert opinion; Equity (law); Psychology; Process (computing); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009211771,0.000220077,0.0009445892,0.00008140328,0.0007422543,0.00007556497,0.0007853112,0.0001208179,0.001516893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006355748,0.00007304121,0.0005871691,0.00226948,0.001414694,0.0001406429,0.0005221831,0.0004911138,0.000004985482],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001209225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007356667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003739564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007056323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947401,0.0003999478,0.001552819,0.0005977545,0.002188187,0.0005211825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958934,0.0005235418,0.002797024,0.0002494635,0.0004098365,0.000126795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001393961,0.0001325637,0.00002764431,0.0005405801,0.00006767489,0.00003843126,0.0001506723,0.00000364667,0.001826978,0.001051649,0.0001641214,0.9959821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005293144,0.01713038,0.005100076,0.01125834,0.0052016,0.005666614,0.003652517,0.004910444,0.007262902,0.04534405,0.8906576,0.003286152],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2738022,0.7084861,0.00001311949,0.0004165914,0.001331447,0.002572389,0.0001659151,0.00005831673,0.01315387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6094187,0.3892879,0.00008804712,0.00002367174,0.0005077092,0.0001196157,0.0001017102,0.000004842405,0.0004478455],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1991232437129097,"score_gpt":0.3932360381824393,"score_spread":0.1941127944695296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}