{"id":"W4210839682","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1370451","title":"Revisiting the Supply-Side Effects of Government Spending","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supply side; Demand side; Business; Government (linguistics); Government spending; Economics; Public economics; Environmental economics; Welfare; Commerce; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464354,0.0007382713,0.001561903,0.001484127,0.0008086036,0.00449071,0.0008784542,0.001846226,0.02418053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01102743,0.0006014228,0.001160908,0.002213453,0.001417204,0.004000037,0.001552002,0.003271692,0.001649142],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002249909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002240915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01636059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02403377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993697,0.0002159068,0.00004302053,0.00009324925,0.0001362004,0.0001420358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803773,0.01563335,0.001744402,0.0006901413,0.001148973,0.0004059018],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002556337,0.0009072704,0.1490797,0.002089654,0.00113024,0.002884867,0.002286292,0.08277418,0.005452705,0.5682492,0.05938363,0.123206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005570404,0.0006228947,0.192458,0.0009059996,0.001619787,0.000478808,0.005412409,0.07441165,0.00712003,0.6461481,0.07008958,0.0001756941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7407398,0.01630046,0.007337104,0.06734639,0.0007182723,0.00004672428,0.004596086,0.0001864309,0.1627288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763644,0.007669443,0.0003889647,0.00147503,0.0007749656,0.00001349878,0.0004347366,0.0001109228,0.01276802],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02418053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08089191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009550247145186742,"score_gpt":0.2038609476699502,"score_spread":0.1943107005247635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}