{"id":"W4210875290","doi":"10.1186/s41935-022-00264-8","title":"Forensic evaluation of pedestrian injuries by FORTIS system and its significance for technical analysis of traffic accidents performed using simulation programs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Traffic and Road Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Pedestrian; Documentation; USable; Computer science; Collision; Transport engineering; Value (mathematics); Forensic engineering; Computer security; Simulation; Engineering; Multimedia; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002384522,0.0001181306,0.0004219496,0.0004452107,0.0002276381,0.00002645564,0.0002086444,0.0000433976,0.00000911155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000911477,0.00009968958,0.0001799282,0.001170089,0.0001846156,0.0002909646,0.00002343473,0.0001056717,3.305762e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001689555,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004750523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003293959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978886,0.00007468701,0.0007456908,0.0001473927,0.0009362311,0.0002074267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988337,0.0001308199,0.0005476379,0.00008520121,0.0003326815,0.00006999028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004547315,0.0000221182,0.003235003,0.00007208137,0.0001692343,3.248346e-7,0.0004581717,0.9453207,0.001037091,0.00002888616,0.00001815737,0.0495928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005467448,0.000528046,0.00933533,0.00007607854,0.001014569,0.00001644753,0.002498878,0.9842802,0.001561319,0.00002760376,0.000009431658,0.0001053387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942191,0.001104862,0.003935623,0.00001758457,0.0002610695,0.0003970682,0.0000289572,0.0000201732,0.00001551733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976608,0.00001055788,0.002267478,0.000001488948,0.00003102364,0.00001080573,0.00000741237,0.000009130872,0.000001374501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04948747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4065223,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0487816134563725,"score_gpt":0.3120263047984774,"score_spread":0.2632446913421049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}