{"id":"W4211214541","doi":"10.18778/1733-8077.3.2.03","title":"Revisiting Trust in Symbolic Interaction: Presentations of Trust Development in University Administration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Qualitative Sociology Review","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Sociology; Conceptualization; Sincerity; Resistance (ecology); The Symbolic; Perspective (graphical); Personalization; Frame (networking); Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Psychoanalysis; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004204019,0.00007414518,0.0003014664,0.00008032988,0.0001586974,0.000003140338,0.000108505,0.0001123117,0.0001735258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006922882,0.00008088854,0.00006209763,0.0004704855,0.0004238456,0.0001513918,0.00001915577,0.000199809,0.00001621152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000147201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002327381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003223115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001824111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997373,0.001692685,0.0004533036,0.0001540141,0.0001201401,0.0002068345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983858,0.001170954,0.0002430945,0.00005138924,0.000105162,0.000043581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003539513,0.00007499524,0.03070011,0.000333879,0.00002188045,0.0000098487,0.7393678,6.936205e-7,0.000005477492,0.2099685,0.0002264377,0.01925494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003582932,0.00004656074,0.1139172,0.001183734,0.00002214584,7.282434e-7,0.8232273,0.000001866388,0.00001649949,0.003569265,0.05745671,0.0001996242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444522,0.01621406,0.0002485375,0.002571246,0.0001378932,0.0005268122,0.000002789638,0.00001626272,0.03583016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896939,0.009235675,0.0003341435,0.0001938355,0.00008253054,0.000007097109,0.00001954426,0.000003262931,0.0004300376],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2063992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3298539,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1158764481070475,"score_gpt":0.4683444386340261,"score_spread":0.3524679905269786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}