{"id":"W4212985291","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2021-0112","title":"A comparative analysis of the in-plane energy absorption capacities of auxetic structures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Cellular and Composite Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Auxetics; Honeycomb; Finite element method; Honeycomb structure; Materials science; Deformation (meteorology); Absorption (acoustics); Plane (geometry); Structural engineering; Composite material; Mechanics; Geometry; Physics; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006362699,0.0000877112,0.0002400949,0.000110476,0.00009766956,0.000003155955,0.0002389938,0.00004560841,0.0000626363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002333422,0.0000728876,0.0005465028,0.0006671598,0.00004132038,0.00001903818,0.000006939185,0.0001677469,8.499465e-9],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001865117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004950406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01189134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04553201,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994281,0.00001330101,0.0002135128,0.0000713841,0.0001387262,0.000134969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996663,0.00005096322,0.00003751768,0.0001866969,0.00002164524,0.00003690145],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003209295,0.000003700714,0.000004565097,0.00004718299,0.0005025233,3.415472e-8,0.0009742855,0.9416472,0.0512886,0.005453309,0.00001484556,0.00006048574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002654054,0.00003335481,0.001059853,0.00001736173,0.0006797237,0.000003188507,0.001207295,0.8253006,0.1700007,0.0007484695,0.0005331364,0.0001509632],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065064,0.0004803998,0.09064058,0.00008197807,0.0006390554,0.0003120983,0.001217131,0.00003321866,0.00008914174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994854,0.00000538695,0.0004338529,0.00001048796,0.000005952649,0.00002342531,0.00001032151,0.000009101844,0.00001609067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1187121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007860342442809769,"score_gpt":0.1864369772837813,"score_spread":0.1785766348409716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}